Donald Trump’s latest immigration crackdown—deporting alleged Tren de Aragua gang members to El Salvador—has hit a judicial wall, sparking outrage and accusations of overreach from both sides. The media spins it as Trump defying the law, while his team calls it a win against crime and activist judges. What’s the truth? Let’s cut through the noise, examine the facts, and see what’s really at play in this showdown over the Alien Enemies Act.
The Trigger: Trump’s Deportation Push
On March 15, 2025, Trump signed a proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, a rarely used wartime law, to deport over 200 alleged members of Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan gang tied to human trafficking and violence. The plan? Fly them to El Salvador’s mega-prison, CECOT, under a deal with President Nayib Bukele, who’d hold them for a year at $6 million U.S. expense. Trump called it a response to an “invasion” of “alien terrorists,” citing crimes like the murders of Laken Riley and Jocelyn Nungaray—cases linked to Venezuelans, though not definitively to Tren de Aragua.
By March 16, planes were airborne from Texas, landing in El Salvador with 238 alleged Tren de Aragua members and 23 MS-13 gangsters. Bukele posted a smug “Oopsie… too late ” on X, showing shackled men marched into CECOT:
The Judicial Slam: Judge Boasberg Steps In
Enter U.S. District Judge James Boasberg. Hours after Trump’s move, on March 15 evening, the ACLU sued on behalf of five Venezuelan detainees, arguing the Act—meant for war with a foreign nation—doesn’t apply to gangs. Boasberg issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) that night, blocking deportations under the Act for 14 days and ordering any in-flight planes to turn back. His ruling hit at 7:25 p.m. ET—too late for the flights, which landed in El Salvador hours later.
Media pounced. The Washington Post (March 16) screamed, “Judge Blocks Trump’s Wartime Deportation Plan,” framing it as a legal smackdown. CNN (March 17) ran “Trump Ignores Court, Deports Gang Members Anyway,” suggesting defiance. Here’s a typical still:
[Insert Screenshot Placeholder: Add CNN’s image of Trump with a headline implying he broke the law]
But did he?
The Evidence: What Really Happened?
Flight data from ABC News (March 17) shows two planes left Texas—G66145 at 5:44 p.m. ET and another at 6:10 p.m.—landing in Honduras, then El Salvador, after Boasberg’s verbal order (6:46 p.m.) but before his written one (7:25 p.m.). A third flight at 7:37 p.m. carried others not under the Act, per the DOJ. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt argued, “The planes were gone before the written order—federal courts can’t touch the President’s foreign affairs power anyway.” Trump himself shrugged to reporters, “These were bad people. I don’t know, ask the lawyers.”
Boasberg wasn’t buying it. On March 17, he grilled the DOJ: “You’re saying my order doesn’t count because it wasn’t in writing fast enough? That’s a heck of a stretch.” He demanded a timeline by March 18 noon, hinting at contempt if the administration knowingly flouted him. X users like
@stillgray cheered Bukele’s taunt, while
@TheRabbitHole84 noted, “Trump condemned the gang—media skips that for the ‘defiance’ angle.”
The Bigger Lie: “Trump’s Lawless Chaos”
The media’s narrative—Trump as a rogue trampling justice—crumbles under scrutiny. Reuters (March 17) admits the Act’s use is a gray area; it’s been invoked only thrice (last in WWII), but its text doesn’t strictly require a declared war—just a foreign “enemy.” Trump’s team tied Tren de Aragua to Venezuela’s regime, a stretch Boasberg rejected, but not baseless given the gang’s origins. Meanwhile, The Guardian (March 17) cried “no due process,” yet ignored that deportees got vetting—though critics like the ACLU’s Lee Gelernt argue it was rushed and opaque.
Contrast this with reality: El Salvador’s photos show shaved, shackled men in CECOT, not a vacation spot:
[Insert Screenshot Placeholder: Add El Salvador’s image of deportees in CECOT, March 16, 2025]
Were they all gang members? Hard to say—U.S. evidence is thin, and families like Aida Diaz’s (per Reuters, March 18) claim innocents got swept up. But “lawless”? Trump acted within his executive lane, even if he pushed it hard.
Judges vs. Power: Who’s Right?
Boasberg’s block rests on shaky ground too. The Act’s scope is broad, and courts rarely curb presidential foreign policy—think Japanese internment, upheld in 1944. X’s
@calguard911 fumed, “ACLU and judges overstep—gangs aren’t choirboys.” Yet, NPR (March 18) notes Boasberg’s due process worry: no hearings, no appeals. Trump’s camp counters with Rubio’s X post (March 16): “Over 250 alien enemies off our streets—thank you, Bukele.” The DOJ appealed to the D.C. Circuit, setting up a constitutional clash.
The Verdict
Trump didn’t “ignore” the law—he raced it, betting on timing and executive muscle. The media’s “chaos” spin skips the Act’s ambiguity and the gang threat—real or hyped. Boasberg’s TRO protects process but ties hands against criminals. Watch the full presser where Trump doubles down:
[Insert Video Placeholder: Embed or link to Trump’s Air Force One remarks, March 16, 2025]
The lie isn’t Trump’s move—it’s the media pretending this is black-and-white. Check the flight logs, the Act’s text, and CECOT’s cells. You decide who’s blocking justice.
Hi, this is a comment.
To get started with moderating, editing, and deleting comments, please visit the Comments screen in the dashboard.
Commenter avatars come from Gravatar.